Right to Work=Right to Jerk Employees Around (Society’s Slideshow)

Michigan politicians are currently batting around an idea to bring jobs to our state. This idea involves creating right to work legislation in Michigan, which will only serve to undermine collective bargaining, break unions, and do absolutely nothing to bring us the jobs we so desperately need for the 11% of the population who is officially unemployed.

In order to understand the dynamics of right to work legislation, one must understand what right to work means. It does not refer to one’s right to seek employment on the open market. Everyone in this country has that right.

Right to work refers to legislation that states people who are represented by a union do not have to pay union dues except on a voluntary basis. This is somewhat akin to a city government deciding to make paying taxes optional. The likely outcome is that more people will opt out than pay the piper.

Unions require a decent amount of manpower to reach collective agreements. Union dues help ameliorate the cost of this business, vis-a-vis paying lawyers to execute the contracts and compensating people for their time spent in negotiations.

If unions are no longer allowed to collect dues, there will be a glut of freeloaders who will take advantage of the union’s representation. The union cannot exclude people from a collective bargaining agreement because they don’t contribute union dues. Therefore, the incentive to pay the dues is nearly non-existent.

Without these dues, collective bargaining efforts may wind up lacking the substance necessary to protect the wages, benefits, and retirement plans of the collective. This will inexorably lead to the demise of the union. No one wants to be represented by an entity that repeatedly fails to deliver on promises made.

Once the union is broken, employers will be left with little incentive to follow due process for releasing employees, increase employee wages, maintain current health benefits, or provide a retirement plan. It has been proven that union employees typically earn 10 to 40 percent more than their non-union employees in the same business. They also tend to have better health benefits and retirement plans as negotiated by their unions.

Removing the collective bargaining tools used for so many decades has no proven effect on job growth. A business owner in a unionized industry may be more inclined to set up shop in a place where they don’t have to negotiate with a union. However, this very same employer will only be regulated by at will employment laws. This means that they can fire anyone for any reason, or no reason, that is not proscribed by federal law.

Last time I checked, the ability to fire anyone for any reason or no reason does not contribute to job growth. It does contribute to employee fear or retribution in the form of a pink slip for speaking up about poor or unsafe working conditions or the fact that they haven’t had a raise in five years.

Right to work legislation will not bring any new jobs to Michigan. Instead, it  ensures that workers will be deprived of due process in termination proceedings and allow corporations to lower wages, reduce or remove benefits, and undermine a worker’s ability to save for retirement. It will also serve to prevent effective collective bargaining between employers and unions which will lead to the ultimate demise of unions that we read about in our history textbooks.

Be sure to write your Michigan Senator and Representative and tell them they are dead wrong about the potential positive outcomes contained in right to work legislation.

 

Putting America Back to Work (Society’s Slideshow)

The current economic crisis has continued on much longer than Barack Obama or any of his contemporaries would like to have seen. The mortgage bubble burst before he was even inaugurated, yet the country was eager to turn to him for answers. His answer was it wasn’t his show yet. When it became his show, he set out to make changes.

Through nearly four years, Obama and our current legislature has grappled with some of the toughest economic times our nation has seen. It has ranged from a nearly bankrupt GM and Chrysler to the current crisis of a 9.1% national average for unemployment and 10.9% unemployment rate for Michigan.

Now that Congress has finished their summer recess, they know that an election is right around the corner. The hottest issue on people’s minds is fixing our broken economy by getting people back to work, which are inextricably linked.

Employers won’t hire new people unless they are making enough money to cover their salary, which requires people to go out and spend money. However, it is very tough to make any but the most necessary purchases when you are on the unemployment rolls, or worse, stuck with no job and unemployment that has run out.

The current approach by Republicans reads a lot like Herbert Hoover’s approach at the beginning of the Great Depression. Hoover, another Republican, coasted into office after two previous Republican presidents who had served during the Roaring Twenties.

At first, Hoover did nothing, believing that government interference would undermine individualism. He believed in volunteerism, thinking that people would simply do the right thing by sustaining current employment rolls and doling out cash to people in need. He did not favor public assistance, believing that it would create an addiction to the system that would take away the will of people to work.

When that didn’t work, he sent all the Mexicans he could manage back to Mexico via the Mexican Repatriation Act. The economy of the nation and the world spiraled out of control, and Hoover finally decided that a whole pile of money and a single public works project would do the trick.

Hoover started work on the Boulder Dam, which would be renamed Hoover Dam after its completion. He also started the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. This entity took $2 billion and gave it in the form of state aid and loans to banks, businesses, and mortgage associations. The idea was that they would take they money and give out more loans, hire more people, and assist people in paying for their houses.

The Reconstruction Finance Corporation was an abysmal failure because banks, businesses, and mortgage associations pocketed the money, paid it back eventually, and did nothing to help the economy in terms of creating new jobs, new loans, and saving people’s homes.

Today, a similar idea is touted as the answer to our economic woes. Give corporations and other businesses tax breaks, and they will use that extra cash to hire more people. Give banks a giant pile of money (say $600 billion) with no terms delineating a repayment schedule or what should be done with the money. Then, sit back, relax, and expect that they’ll do the “right thing” by loaning more money to struggling businesses and helping people in trouble with their mortgages.

If it didn’t work during the Great Depression, why would politicians expect it to work today?

The only thing that will get this economy going is putting people back to work. Franklin Roosevelt knew it in 1932 when he became President of the United States. That’s why he created the Works Progress Administration, the Civilian Conservation Corps, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and a few other alphabet soup groups.

Roosevelt knew then what politicians should know now. Putting money in the hands of regular people means that they will go out and spend it on needs, then wants. Eventually, the money will find its way into the hands of business owners, banks, and mortgage associations. It was termed “pump priming” and it worked.

I propose that a similar solution could work today, sort of a WPA reboot. My version reads like this:

  • Bring all of our troops home.
  • Use the money we would normally be spending in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya over here for “nation building.”
  • Allow the military to bid for open contracts paid out of this money against private contractors. Military personnel not used for nation building as a member of the military should have no problem getting a job with one of the civilian contractors.
  • Rebuild our crumbling infrastructure and start other public works projects after 90% of roads, bridges, and sewers are fixed.

America can no longer afford to bankroll tax breaks for corporations and the wealthy on the backs of average citizens. The less money 99% of the population has, the worse the economy will get.

Write your State Representatives, Senators, and even the President and tell them you’ve had enough of bankrolling corporate tax breaks. Tell them the only way to build our economy is from the bottom up, not from the top down.